A Brief Review of Other Notable Electrophoretic Methods.

Electrophoretic methodologies for qualitative and preparative purposes are commonly used in biological research and have been well established as an integral analytical tool for a long time in most research laboratories. Listed here are some of the more specialized innovations that have been developed in recent times for special purposes of study. These include micropreparative isoelectric focusing in liquid suspension, accelerated protease digestion by SDS-PAGE, two-dimensional SDS-PAGE for membrane protein resolution, carbon nanotube-modified page for resolution of complement C3, electrophoretic resolution of ultra-acidic proteomes in acidic media, and two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis of pre-beta/alpha lipoprotein A-I in agarose. All these methods are briefly reviewed in this chapter.

Anti-Ro and Concomitant Anti-La Autoantibodies Strongly Associated With Anti-oxLDL or Anti-Phospholipid Antibody in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Premature atherosclerosis is observed in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Oxidative modification of LDL is associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that anti-oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and anti-phospholipid (APL) in SLE sera would segregate with specific antibody subsets, and that anti-oxLDL antibodies will linger in circulation over an extended period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven SLE and control subjects and two SLE subjects with sera collected longitudinally for 13 years were tested for anti-oxLDL and IgG/IgM/IgA APL antibodies. RESULTS: Anti-oxLDL ELISA values above 57.48 Activity Units (AcU) (means of normals + 3 standard deviations) and anti-IgG/IgM/IgA APL above 10 phospholipid units (PU) were considered positive. Average anti-oxLDL was 67.7 ± 50.5 AcU in SLE compared to 23.9 ± 11.19 AcU in normals (P = 0.018). Ten out of ten subjects with anti-Ro60/anti-La/anti-Ro52 antibodies had highly significant (P < 0.0001) anti-oxLDL (127.29 ± 45.67 AcU) and IgG APL (18.66 ± 7.4 PU) (P < 0.02). Subjects with anti-RNP were positive for anti-oxLDL (P < 0.002), but subjects with anti-Ro60/anti-Ro52 and subjects negative for extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibody were not positive for anti-oxLDL. Anti-oxLDL/anti-IgG APL remained significantly elevated in two patients studied longitudinally. Interestingly, one developed anti-oxLDL/anti-APL antibodies several years before anti-Ro60 development. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of antibodies against Ro RNP and La, and RNP is highly associated with developing anti-oxLDL and APL antibodies in SLE. It will be clinically important to see if cardiovascular events occur in these SLE subsets having elevated anti-oxLDL and APL antibodies. Emergence of anti-oxLDL/IgG APL before anti-Ro60 over time in a patient indicates that these antibodies could not be cross-reactive in nature, at least in this particular patient.

A brief review of other notable electrophoretic methods.

The use of electrophoretic methodologies for use in qualitative and preparative purposes are commonly used in biological research and have been well established as an integral analytical tool for a long time in most research laboratories. Listed here are some of the more specialized innovations that have been developed in recent times for special purposes of study. These include micropreparative isoelectric focusing in liquid suspension, accelerated protease digestion by SDS-PAGE, two-dimensional SDS-PAGE for membrane protein resolution, carbon nanotube-modified page for resolution of complement C3, electrophoretic resolution of ultra-acidic proteomes in acidic media, and two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis of pre-beta/alpha lipoprotein A-I in agarose. All these methods are briefly reviewed in this chapter.

Effects of autoimmune antibodies anti-lipoprotein lipase, anti-low density lipoprotein, and anti-oxidized low density lipoprotein on lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Premature development of atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus has been widely reported. Anti-lipoprotein lipase antibody may be one cause contributing to this disorder. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of coronary risk due to autoimmune antibodies in terms of carotid plaque in lupus patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 114 documented lupus patients with 111 normal controls matched for sex and age. Anti-lipoprotein lipase (A-LPL), anti-oxidized low density lipoprotein (A-OXLDL), and anti-low density lipoprotein (A-LDL) were measured by enzme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. Low density lipoprotein-triglyceride (LDL-Trig) and high density lipoprotein-triglyceride (HDL-Trig) were also measured. Plaque was measured by bilateral carotid ultrasound. RESULTS: 45.6% of patients tested positive for A-LPL, and 34.4% for A-OXLDL. 44% of normal controls tested positive for A-LPL, and 20% for A-OXLDL. Risk increased sharply in subgroups with increased antibody levels. Patients with A-LPL and A-OXLDL > 0.40 (n = 12) showed coronary risk correlations of: A-LPL x LDL-Trig = 0.7008, P = 0.0111; bilateral ultrasound vs total cholesterol = 0.62205, P = 0.0308; LDL-Trig vs myocardial infarction (MI) = 0.76562, P = 0.0037; total triglycerides vs MI = 0.78191, P = 0.0027); LDL-Trig/LDL-cholesterol vs MI = 0.80493, P = 0.0016; A-OXLDL vs USBL = 0.71930, P = 0.0084. Correlations of SLEDAI with risk variables were highly significant only in subgroups of elevated antibody levels (SLEDAI x A-OXLDL = 0.70366, P = 0.0107). CONCLUSION: A-LPL initiates the development of LDL mutations, followed by antibody production, plaque formation and coronary risk in some SLE patients.

Efeitos de autoanticorpos antilipoproteína lipase, antilipoproteína de baixa densidade e antilipoproteína de baixa densidade oxidada sobre o metabolismo lipídico e aterosclerose no lúpus eritematoso sistêmico / Effects of autoimmune antibodies anti-lipoprotein lipase, anti-low density lipoprotein, and anti-oxidized low density lipoprotein on lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUÇÃO: O desenvolvimento prematuro de aterosclerose em lúpus eritematoso sistêmico tem sido amplamente divulgado. Anticorpo antilipoproteína lipase pode ser uma das causas que contribuem para esta doença. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o grau de risco coronariano devido a autoanticorpos em termos de placa carotídea em pacientes com lúpus. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Comparamos 114 pacientes com lúpus documentado e 111 controles normais pareados por sexo e idade. Antilipoproteína lipase (A-LPL), antilipoproteínas de baixa densidade oxidada (A-OXLDL), e antilipoproteínas de baixa densidade (A-LDL) foram medidos pelo teste imunoenzimático - ELISA. LDL-triglicéride (LDL-Trig) e HDL-Trig também foram dosados. A placa foi medida por ultrassom bilateral de carótida. RESULTADOS: 45,6 por cento dos pacientes foram positivos para A-LDL e 34,4 por cento para A-OXLDL; 44 por cento dos controles foram positivos para A-LDL e 20 por cento para A-OXLDL. O risco aumentou acentuadamente nos subgrupos com níveis elevados de anticorpos. Pacientes com A-LDL e A-OXLDL > 0,40 (n = 12) mostraram correlações de risco coronariano de: ALDL vs LDL-Trig = 0,7008, P = 0,0111; ultrassom bilateral vs colesterol = 0,62205, P = 0,0308; LDL-Trig vs infarto do miocárdio (IM) = 0,76562, P =0,0037; triglicerídeos totais vs IM = 0,78191, P = 0.0027); LDL-Trig/LDL-colesterol vs IM = 0,80493, P = 0,0016; A-OXLDL vs USBL = 0,71930, P = 0,0084. Correlações do SLEDAI com as variáveis de risco foram altamente significativas somente nos subgrupos com níveis elevados de anticorpos (SLEDAI x A-OXLDL = 0,70366, P = 0,0107). CONCLUSÃO: A-LPL inicia o desenvolvimento de mutações de LDL, seguido pela produção de anticorpos, formação da placa e do risco coronariano em alguns pacientes com lúpus erimatoso sistêmico (LES).

INTRODUCTION: Premature development of atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus has been widely reported. Anti-lipoprotein lipase antibody may be one cause contributing to this disorder. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of coronary risk due to autoimmune antibodies in terms of carotid plaque in lupus patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 114 documented lupus patients with 111 normal controls matched for sex and age. Anti-lipoprotein lipase (A-LPL), anti-oxidized low density lipoprotein (A-OXLDL), and anti-low density lipoprotein (A-LDL) were measured by enzme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. Low density lipoprotein-triglyceride (LDL-Trig) and high density lipoprotein-triglyceride (HDL-Trig) were also measured. Plaque was measured by bilateral carotid ultrasound. RESULTS: 45.6 percent of patients tested positive for A-LPL, and 34.4 percent for A-OXLDL. 44 percent of normal controls tested positive for A-LPL, and 20 percent for A-OXLDL. Risk increased sharply in subgroups with increased antibody levels. Patients with A-LPL and A-OXLDL > 0.40 (n = 12) showed coronary risk correlations of: A-LPL x LDL-Trig = 0.7008, P = 0.0111; bilateral ultrasound vs total cholesterol = 0.62205, P = 0.0308; LDL-Trig vs myocardial infarction (MI) = 0.76562, P = 0.0037; total triglycerides vs MI = 0.78191, P = 0.0027); LDL-Trig/LDL-cholesterol vs MI = 0.80493, P = 0.0016; A-OXLDL vs USBL = 0.71930, P = 0.0084. Correlations of SLEDAI with risk variables were highly significant only in subgroups of elevated antibody levels (SLEDAI x A-OXLDL = 0.70366, P = 0.0107). CONCLUSION: A-LPL initiates the development of LDL mutations, followed by antibody production, plaque formation and coronary risk in some SLE patients.

Autoantibodies to lipoprotein lipase and dyslipidemia in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the binding of bovine lipoprotein lipase (LPL) by IgG from sera obtained from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other rheumatic diseases, and the relationship of anti-LPL to triglyceride levels in SLE. METHOD: Binding of LPL by IgG from sera obtained from patients with SLE and other rheumatic diseases was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. Lipid profiles for fasting blood samples obtained from SLE patients and control subjects were determined. RESULTS: Sera obtained from 105 patients with SLE were assessed for reactivity with LPL, and 49 (47%) of the results were positive. Sera obtained from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 80), Sjögren's syndrome (n = 30), polymyositis and dermatomyositis (n = 30), and progressive systemic sclerosis (n = 31) were also studied, and 10 (13%), 3 (10%), 12 (40%), and 13 (42%), respectively, were positive for reactivity with LPL. It was determined that all affinity-purified anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies and 4 of 5 monoclonal anti-dsDNA antibodies bound to LPL. The binding of IgG depleted of anti-dsDNA to LPL indicates a second anti-LPL activity in SLE. Measurements of fasting lipid levels in SLE patients with anti-LPL revealed a strong positive correlation of antibody levels and total serum triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein E concentrations. CONCLUSION: Antibodies to LPL occurred in 47% of SLE patients and in a similar percentage of patients with polymyositis or systemic sclerosis. The prevalence of these antibodies was less in patients with RA or Sjögren's syndrome. It is hypothesized that the elevated triglyceride levels in SLE patients are in part attributable to anti-LPL, and this lipid abnormality could contribute to the premature atherosclerosis known to be present in patients with SLE.